[Serusers] rport OK in 0.8.10 ?

Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
Tue Dec 9 10:28:01 CET 2003


I suspect giving it a try would get you answer quicker than asking the mailing
list :) Nevertheless, the answer is yes, rport works. Best use 8.12 -- 8.10 is
really old.

-jiri

At 11:11 PM 12/8/2003, Lasse Jansson wrote:
>Hi,
>
>http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-April/000019.html (text copied 
>below) says that the rport functionality in ser-cvs-version at that time was 
>not correct.
>
>I have a simple question related to that:
>- Is the rport functionality correct in ser-0.8.10, or is the same problem 
>present there ?
>
>(The "ISSUES" file does not mention any problems related to rport for any ser 
>release, but I want to be sure)
>
>/Lasse
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
><http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-April/000019.html> follows:
>[Serdev] Re: received-rport in SER ?
>
>Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
> Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:57:34 +0200
>
>Previous message: [Serdev] Re: Accounting module mods with MySQL and SERWEB
>Next message: [Serdev] RE: [Serusers] Accounting Script 
>Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>
>Hopefuly, it is now fixed on CVS. We haven't tested too much yet, though.
>
>-Jiri
>
>At 12:37 AM 4/2/2003, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>>On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 06:28:30PM +0200, Sergio Miguel Garcia wrote:
>>> Hello, 
>>>
>>> I have been looking for symmetric-reponse ( receiver-rport pair ) in the 
>mailing lists of SER, and I found some interesting mails about the same issue 
>from you
>>> I've been trying with the CVS version and got these results: ... when I 
>append an empty "rport" in the Via header, the server fills the Via header 
>with the correct values of "rport" and "received", but the packet is sent 
>back to the "received" IP BUT to the port scpecified in the Via header 
>instead of the "rport" port.
>>> This means that the response of the request never reaches the original UA 
>using a symmetric NAT ( althought the return IP address is correct), because 
>SER sents the UDP packet to a internal port.
>>>
>>> I've tried with the Vovida SIP server v1.4 and works fine. Have you tried 
>to fix it or know someone that have tried to solve this issue ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your help and best regards.
>>>
>>> Sergio.
>
>--
>Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 




More information about the sr-users mailing list