[Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy

[Darren Sessions]

I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.

I'll let you know how it goes..


-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy


Darren,

3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8.  Maxim also put some
time into it but I was never able to get it to compile.  If you have better
luck please let us all know.

Thanks,
Andres.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy


> I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with Solaris
9.
>
> root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
> cc  -o main.o -c main.c
> In file included from main.c:45:
> myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
> main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
> main.c: In function `main':
> main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
> make: *** [main.o] Error 1
>
> I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
>
> I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
Makefile.gnu
> up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris".
>
> Any help would be appreciated! :)
>
> Thanks,
>
>  - Darren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> [mailto:pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
> To: Darren Sessions
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
wrote:
> > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for Nathelper
> and
> > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards?
>
> No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they must
> be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).
>
> Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to avoid
>  packets with different source address than the destination of the intial
>  packet going back to the nat).
>
> >then
> > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and the
> > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
>
>
> Andrei
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>