[Serusers] SERWeb for 0.8.12

[Jon Ole Nome]

Hi,

check your /tmp/ser_fifo permissions, make sure the userid that runs your
webserver has access.

Jon Ole
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aaron Daubman" <daubman at ll.mit.edu>
To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 3:47 PM
Subject: [Serusers] SERWeb for 0.8.12


> Hi,
>
> I'm just getting started with SER and SERWeb on a FreeBSD 5.1 system.
> The SER install went smoothly (compiled from source) and the database
> seemed to go in fine.  Once SER was in place I went looking for serweb
> but there wasn't a package for 'latest' yet (that I could find).
>
> I tried the serweb package from 0.8.11 and ran into some problems (I
> just grabbed serweb from CVS and it seems to be the same).
>
> 1) in config.php (and a few other places I'm now forgetting) the user
> pages path is set (or hard-coded) to /user/, however the included
> directory is user_interface/
> (e.g. $this->user_pages_path = $this->root_path."user/";, as well as the
> reg and confirmation URLs)
> That was easy enough to fix, however it was somewhat concerning.
>
> 2) After submitting a request for an account and following the emailed
> URL, I've consistently gotten errors.  They seem to point at the
> database, but reinit'ing it did not help.
> The errors were:
> - error in SQL query, line: 43 (from the confirmation.php page)
> - Something to do with aliases (cannot currently generate the error)
> like use save("aliases") or update("aliases) in config script before
using.
>
> The second error seems to be a problem, as the account is added, but
> without the requested phone number aliased. (there don't seem to be any
> aliases).
>
> 3) I consistently get a 404 not found when trying to IM any of the users
> on the system - is this also related to the lack of/problem with aliases?
>
> Aside from these errors, I was able to register with two Cisco 7960s
> using the requested and confirmed accounts (not yet able to test
> calling, although without the aliases I assume it would fail) as well as
> modify account parameters from serweb.
>
> Is there a specific release of serweb that should be used with 0.8.12,
> or one that is "least buggy"?
>
> Thank you,
> ~Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers