[sr-dev] new columns in active_watchers/rls_watchers/silo

[Peter Dunkley]

Hi Daniel,

rls_watchers is the same as active_watchers (holding state for presence
dialogs).  No persistent data is held in these tables.

Hugh (who did the extra headers development) is looking at the silo
table.

Regards,

Peter

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 09:40 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> looking at changes in the database structure from 3.2 to 3.3, I noticed 
> the columns in active_watchers/rls_watches that have no default value 
> and cannot be NULL.
> 
> The usual issue with this kind of upgrades is that existing rows have to 
> be removed. active_watchers is with temporary records, and I guess that 
> is the same with rls_watchers. No persistent data is to be lost, right?
> 
> Another one is extra_hdrs in silo table. I think it should be allowed to 
> be NULL or default '' (empty string), so stored messages will not be 
> lost - the check over the code showed inserting '' if no extra headers 
> are present at message storage time.
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 


-- 
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20120504/e2bfa3e2/attachment.htm>