[sr-dev] exec module

[Ovidiu Sas]

There is an ongoing effort to merge duplicate modules or move them
into the obsolete folder.
Most used ones are from modules_k.

-ovidiu

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Konstantin M. <evilzluk at gmail.com> wrote:
> I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules
> are valid ?
> +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
> |    module_name            | modules | modules_k | modules_s |
> +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
> | acc_radius                |         |     x     |    x      |
> | auth_db                   |         |     x     |    x      |
> | auth_radius               |         |     x     |    x      |
> | cpl-c                     |         |     x     |    x      |
> | domain                    |         |     x     |    x      |
> | exec                      |         |     x     |    x      |
> | ldap                      |         |     x     |    x      |
> | maxfwd                    |         |     x     |    x      |
> | nathelper                 |         |     x     |    x      |
> | permissions               |         |     x     |    x      |
> | pike                      |         |     x     |    x      |
> | registrar                 |         |     x     |    x      |
> | rr                        |         |     x     |    x      |
> | textops                   |         |     x     |    x      |
> | uri_db                    |         |     x     |    x      |
> | usrloc                    |         |     x     |    x      |
> +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
>
>
> 2012/12/13 Konstantin M. <evilzluk at gmail.com>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see:
>> loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
>>
>> but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules
>> but existing in modules_k and modules_s both.
>> Which one is a valid ?