[sr-dev] exec module

[Konstantin M.]

I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which
modules are valid ?
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+
|    module_name            | modules | modules_k | modules_s |
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+
| acc_radius                |         |     x     |    x      |
| auth_db                   |         |     x     |    x      |
| auth_radius               |         |     x     |    x      |
| cpl-c                     |         |     x     |    x      |
| domain                    |         |     x     |    x      |
| exec                      |         |     x     |    x      |
| ldap                      |         |     x     |    x      |
| maxfwd                    |         |     x     |    x      |
| nathelper                 |         |     x     |    x      |
| permissions               |         |     x     |    x      |
| pike                      |         |     x     |    x      |
| registrar                 |         |     x     |    x      |
| rr                        |         |     x     |    x      |
| textops                   |         |     x     |    x      |
| uri_db                    |         |     x     |    x      |
| usrloc                    |         |     x     |    x      |
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+


2012/12/13 Konstantin M. <evilzluk at gmail.com>

> Hello,
>
> Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see:
> loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
>
> but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules
> but existing in modules_k and modules_s both.
> Which one is a valid ?
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20121213/102dd419/attachment.htm>