[sr-dev] personal summary of what still needs to be done

[Juha Heinanen]

Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:

 > Right now, we have tm.t_uac_wait, which should behave like t_uac_dlg
 > (there are some output differences, but we can have another version with
 > whatever output format is needed) and it works "async" on xmlrpc.
 > There is no support for mi_rpc async, but is it really needed? Is there
 > another async mi command ?(even if it is, it might be easier to re-write
 > it in terms of rpc then try to make mi_rpc translate also the mi async
 > callback to rpc).

andrei,

for me xmlrpc transport is enough for tm.t_uac_wait.  i thought to test
it today, but cannot find documentation about its parameters.  would it
be possible to add the t_uac_wait to tm README?

-- juha