[sr-dev] crash with dialog module

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 20.07.2009 9:47 Uhr, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
>> On 19.07.2009 17:42 Uhr, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>>> Alex Balashov writes:
>>>
>>>  > The new inventions Daniel introduced in 1.5.x - especially 
>>> dlg_bridge() -
>>>  > have also served me incredibly well.  It's allowed me to totally 
>>> ditch
>>>  > Asterisk in a couple of outbound call broadcast scenarios.  Great 
>>> stuff!
>>>
>>> if you need to do that kind of bridging often, then sure dialog module
>>> is a way to go. daniel suggested that i could use dialog module 
>>> dlg_bridge mi command to
>>> implement click-to-dial calls.
>>>
>>> if only a very small percentage of all calls would be click-to-dial
>>> calls and thus use dialog module, would it introduce a performance
>>> penalty for every bye (or even for every in-dialog) request, because
>>> they need to be checked for did param in route header?
>>>   
>>
>> the initial dialog created by dlg_bridge (invite+refer+bye) is not 
>
> How are NOTIFYs sent by the transferee handled? Are they also 
> auomatically answered with 200?
Yes. The whole process is a sequence of calling TM uac functions, 
passing a dlg structure as callback parameters in order to construct 
in-dialog requests.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-bootcamp/