[sr-dev] crash with dialog module

[Klaus Darilion]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
> 
> 
> On 19.07.2009 17:42 Uhr, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> Alex Balashov writes:
>>
>>  > The new inventions Daniel introduced in 1.5.x - especially 
>> dlg_bridge() -
>>  > have also served me incredibly well.  It's allowed me to totally ditch
>>  > Asterisk in a couple of outbound call broadcast scenarios.  Great 
>> stuff!
>>
>> if you need to do that kind of bridging often, then sure dialog module
>> is a way to go. 
>> daniel suggested that i could use dialog module dlg_bridge mi command to
>> implement click-to-dial calls.
>>
>> if only a very small percentage of all calls would be click-to-dial
>> calls and thus use dialog module, would it introduce a performance
>> penalty for every bye (or even for every in-dialog) request, because
>> they need to be checked for did param in route header?
>>   
> 
> the initial dialog created by dlg_bridge (invite+refer+bye) is not 

How are NOTIFYs sent by the transferee handled? Are they also 
auomatically answered with 200?

regards
klaus


> tracked by dialog module (nor stored in db). There is no penalty, the 
> call created by one side because of REFER comes to proxy as an usual 
> call and it is a matter of config to be tacked or not.
> 
> Bottom line, if you load dialog module just for dlg_bridge (don't set 
> the dlg flag nor use dlg_manage() in config), there is no effect for any 
> of the calls.
> 
> Daniel
>