[sr-dev] problem with locally generated ACKs

[Juha Heinanen]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

 > > in the case that i reported, the ack was to 200 ok and thus not part of
 > > invite/200 ok transaction.  in that case, the ack should be sent to
 > > contact uri of 200 ok (there was no rr in 200 ok).
 > >    
 > ahh, right, I got it wrong in the first place.

but reply could be negative too.  the system has to work no matter if
positive or negative reply is received.

 > Then, in this case, might be good to call the event_route as well. I was 
 > thinking the case of negative reply, where no much could have been done 
 > in terms of routing.

you mean calling event_route on ack?  according to xlog call that i have
in event_route [tm:local-request], it is NOT called on ack to 200 ok.

-- juha