[sr-dev] problem with locally generated ACKs

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 12/18/09 2:21 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>   >  Isn't the RFC requiring to send cancel and negative ack to the same
>   >  destination as INVITE?
>
> in the case that i reported, the ack was to 200 ok and thus not part of
> invite/200 ok transaction.  in that case, the ack should be sent to
> contact uri of 200 ok (there was no rr in 200 ok).
>    
ahh, right, I got it wrong in the first place.

Then, in this case, might be good to call the event_route as well. I was 
thinking the case of negative reply, where no much could have been done 
in terms of routing.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/