[sr-dev] problem with locally generated ACKs

[Juha Heinanen]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

 > Isn't the RFC requiring to send cancel and negative ack to the same 
 > destination as INVITE?

in the case that i reported, the ack was to 200 ok and thus not part of
invite/200 ok transaction.  in that case, the ack should be sent to
contact uri of 200 ok (there was no rr in 200 ok).

-- juha