[OpenSER-Devel] discussion: issues with local_route

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 06/25/08 08:58, Dan Pascu wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>   
>> For me it is clear a major internal architecture change as none of my
>> (and I spotted same for other parts) code was written with nested
>> contexts in mind. I am not going now over all code to make a report,
>> just because some code was released in the last minute without
>> considering the impact on the rest of the application -- does not pay
>> the effort.
>>
>> I presented sustainable examples and reasons, those might be all or
>> there might be lot more  - see dset.{c,h} all that code is not designed
>> for nested contexts, time-related PVs have different results, a.s.o.
>> Simply I don't have that time to prepare release and re-thinks code
>> considered stable for ages.
>>
>> Again, it is no time for me to check and test all the code I wrote in 8
>> years, ...
>>     
>
> Nobody asked you to review 8 years of code, though the irony is that you 
> said you'd do that yourself when you opened the issue and proposed the 
> unfreeze. Anyway, what I asked was to provide one example where the 
> local_route breaks functionality in such a way that it cannot be fixed 
> without rethinking the design and certainly not during the 1 month bug 
> fix period before the release. I figured that since you say that the 
> local_route is such a big architectural change with so much impact over 
> all code, it wouldn't be hard to find one good example why local_route 
> should be disabled in 1.4. Then I would have supported your proposal. But 
> so far I've only seen buzzwords about architecture and design, and a few 
> examples with bugs that are easy to fix.
>
> Frankly I do not think you make your case if you keep repeating that we 
> have big problems, yet you do not provide a clear example that will prove 
> beyond any reasonable doubt that claim. All the examples you point back 
> to have been since rebutted or have simple fixes.
>
> For me it's obvious at this point that you have a horse to beat and you 
> won't stop until it's dead, which makes dialog and working on the issue 
> very difficult.
>   
I think your insults are enough and no matter examples and explanations 
I would give, you come out of the context by following personal interests.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
http://www.asipto.com