[OpenSER-Devel] SVN frozen or not?

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Henning,

to be honest, I do not like what happens:

1) major design issues and architectural reasons are invoked just to 
mislead people around and delay the freeze - and now the only changes 
are about enabling the local_route for more certain 
modules...hmmm...This looks like pushing arguments for one thing and 
actually doing something else at the end.

2) waste of time - these changes could have been done last Friday if 
somebody would have said it clear - it is a task that takes maximum one 
hour.

3) the whole discussion about the initial commit was about principals 
and how each opinion matters for the project - now, based on three 
people opinion, the SVN is partially un-frozen without no prior 
notification about this decision. Are only three developers in this project?

4) changes started to be done, but without no prior consultation on the 
matter - if I'm not wrong this was the main invoked reason for this 
whole discussion.....

again , I do not like this because some serious disrespect for the 
people working here in this project.

Regards,
bogdan

Henning Westerholt wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>   
>> Is the SVN frozen or not? The announced date was for 6th of June and
>> there is an ongoing discussion about pre-longing this date or not, but
>> there was no decision yet announced.
>>
>> And I see non bug fixing commits going through.....
>>     
>
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Dan, Juha and myself agreed that it is ok if Daniel integrate local_route in 
> the next few days. Thus for this work the code freeze is not in place, for 
> all other work it is. At the end of the week this work will be finished, and 
> then only documentation, bug-fixes and helper tools commits will be done, as 
> its policy.
>
> Henning
>
>