[Devel] acc diff

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

it makes sense, so I think we can reduce even more the minimal set of 
acc values.

Does anybody see any drawback?

regards,
bogdan


Juha Heinanen wrote:

>Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
>
> > Now, regarding the Cseq, From and To URIs :
> >     from/to URIs are dialog matching elements and they might be useful 
> > if you do CDR generation.
>
>i agree that they are useful, but still should not be in the minimal
>set, because they are not needed in bye message, for example, which is
>matched to corresponding invite using call id and tags.  
>
>also, as i mentioned, i don't take Called-Station-Id from To URI, but
>from Request URI after i have canonized it.  for example, if user made a
>call without country code and area code, To URI user part contains just
>the local number. after canonization R-URI user part will contain the
>full E.164 number, which is much more useful to store in
>Called-Station-ID that the local number in the To URI.
>
>README file could have an example of extra item
>
>Called-Station-Id=$tu
>
>which would maintain the current behavior.  the same for
>Calling-Station-Id.
>
>-- juha
>  
>