[Kamailio-Users] Issue with dialog module
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc at aliax.net
Thu Feb 18 11:16:39 CET 2010
El Jueves, 18 de Febrero de 2010, Santiago Gimeno escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using kamailio 1.5 from the branch. In a conditional forwarding
> scenario with this call flow:
>
>
> Phone A Kamailio Phone B Phone C
>
> |INVITE | | |
> |------------->| | |
> |100 Trying | | |
> |<-------------| | |
> |
> | |INVITE | |
> | |------------->| |
> | |100 trying | |
> | |<-------------| |
> | |180 Ringing | |
> | |<-------------| |
> |
> |180 Ringing | | |
> |<-------------| | |
> |
> | |486 Busy Here | |
> | |<-------------| |
> | |ACK | |
> | |------------->| |
> | |INVITE | |
> | |---------------------------->|
> | |100 trying | |
> | |<----------------------------|
> | |180 Ringing | |
> | |<----------------------------|
> |
> |180 Ringing | | |
> |<-------------| | |
> |
> | |200 OK | |
> | |<----------------------------|
> |
> |200 OK | | |
> |<-------------| | |
> |ACK | | |
> |------------->| | |
> |
> | |ACK | |
> | |---------------------------->|
>
> What I'm observing is that when Kamailio receives the 486 from B, the
> dialog between A and B is not destroyed, so when the call is finally
> established between A and C there are two active dialogs as I could check
> with `kamctl fifo get_statistics active_dialogs`. Shouldn't there be only
> one active dialog? Is this a problem in my script or a problem with the
> dialog module?
For now dialog module is not "forking-aware" which means that fails detecting
cases like yours. However I don't know which should be the expected behaviour
for your case (serial forking) with the current dialog module code.
PS: Could you tell me how did you "paint" the above SIP flow? it's very nice
:)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net>
More information about the Users
mailing list