[Kamailio-Users] [sr-dev] [SR-Users] kamailio 3.0 - the time before freezing

[Klaus Darilion]

MÉSZÁROS Mihály schrieb:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>>
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
>>> 2009/8/24 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> I am personally aware of companies using Kamailio with several 
>>>> millions of
>>>> subscribers, using kamailio database schema. Also, I am aware of 
>>>> companies
>>>> having more or less same level of subscriber base using SER database 
>>>> schema.
>>>> All have additional tools for management, integration with third-party
>>>> application, a.s.o. Do you think that saying "hey, you were the unlucky
>>>> bastard because we are going to drop tomorrow the database schema 
>>>> you are
>>>> using" is the solution?
>>>
>>> That's right, but I don't expect that migration to SR is a priority
>>> for those companies already using OpenSER/Kamailio. For example, I
>>> know some companies still using OpenSer 1.2.
>>>
>>> However, it seems that the idea is that Kamailio/SER will use SR as
>>> core, but the fact is that SR core uses current Kamailio and SER
>>> modules/features as separate (modules_k, modules_s...). Wouldn't make
>>> sense to unify SR code instead of having it splited in K and S? 
>>
>> I always is a matter of viewpoint (If A sits next to B, B also sits 
>> next to A). Of course you could have it in 3 repositories: 1xSR, 1xser 
>> and 1xKamailio. But the decision was to use a single repository for 
>> easier developing (e.g. core API changes require module changes too).
>>
>> So, at the moment SR is the common repository for Kamailio 
>> (modules_k+modules+core) and ser (modules_s+modules+core). So, I think 
>> the next Kamailio release (source ball) might have just modules_k and 
>> modules. And ser does not need to distribute modules_k. However, if 
>> somebody wants to make fine selection, modules_s and modules_k can be 
>> mixed too.
>>
> Hi!
> 
> I want only mention my experience. (I am pretty new using sip-router.)
> I tried to mix the modules but it didn't work for me.
> So I want some modules from modules_s (xlog,auth_identiy ...) and other 
> from modules_p (presence etc.)
> But i have failed. :(
> I must choose from the two repository. I can't use it together.
> The key problem was that SL modul is not merged. Many modules depends on 
> this modul.


Yes, that's true. That's why Daniel said he tries to merge the sl modules

regards
klaus