[Kamailio-Users] Dialog profile persistence - DB vs. memory.
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Nov 11 00:41:03 CET 2008
Jerome,
Jerome Martin wrote:
> You are getting confused between the actual dialogs stored persistently
> in databe and the dialog _profiles_ information.
>
> The dialogs are persistent in db_mode > 0, and upon restart of the
> proxy, based on proxy IPs, the dialogs will be restored in memory from
> database. This allows to perform dialog-matching for subsequent
> requests.
>
> For instance, if you start a dialog, then restart the proxy (reloading
> the dialog info from database), you will notice that a BYE for this
> dialog that arrives after the restart will trigger the correct
> computation of $DLG_duration (this is just an example).
>
> Dialog profiles, on the other hand, is transient, in-memroy information
> that is not currently stored in database. I think the main reason is
> that dialog profiles were initially intended to be used for statistics,
> not dialog matching/accounting/authorisation.
>
> However your use case, IMHO, is valid and deserves to be taken into
> consideration for future dialog module improvements.
>
> I hope this clarifies the point of storing dialogs in database ...
That does, indeed, clarify. Thank you. I assumed that a "profile" is
just an abstraction around certain properties of the dialog built into
its hash information, but was suspecting that there may be more
meta-data involved.
But as you rightly observe, that does complicate my use case. In this
case, if I fail over while a call is in progress and then the BYE for it
arrives, while it may calculate $DLG_duration usefully for example, the
proxy will not recognise it as belonging to an existing dialog and
refuse to forward it or any other in-dialog messages.
So, it seems that while "this allows to perform dialog-matching for
subsequent requests," this is true in one type of use case but -
critically and very importantly - not in another. Since is_in_profile()
is the only way to check if a request belongs to a known dialog,
authorisation is thus tied to profiles rather than mere awareness of
certain dialogs. This is unfortunate. All I want to do is check if
subsequent in-dialog requests belong to a known dialog; I care not
whether this is done by dipping into "profiles" or simply asking the
dialog module, "Do you know about this dialog?"
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
More information about the Users
mailing list