[Users] "detached" timer

[Jiri Kuthan]

At 14:54 30/03/2007, Jerome Martin wrote:
>On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:44 +0300, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: 
>>
>>
>>jiri,
>>
>>that is incorrect information - there was no plan / need / acceptance 
>>for the port you are mentioning.
>>
>>I thing you realize that the TM+timer code from SER and OpenSER is 
>>following different direction of development, which makes  quite 
>>unrealistic  your sayings.
>
>HA ! I understand better now, I almost got confused 
>:-)
> 

Well actually the previous statement got me more confused. I don't see the real
point in forking to a different direction off the robustness features. Following
different direction is not apparently something what happens on its own, it 
is something some must be striving for and I clearly don't see the point in it.

-jiri




--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 18c61b1.jpg
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1142 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070330/03f41c3a/attachment.obj