[Users] "detached" timer

[Jiri Kuthan]

At 14:44 30/03/2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>jiri,
>
>that is incorrect information - there was no plan / need / acceptance for the port you are mentioning.

ok, I think that's a kind of pity, since this addresses some of the problems in question.
I was hoepful we would have the capacity to port, but momentarily I'm not so optimistic
about our cycles.

>I thing you realize that the TM+timer code from SER and OpenSER is following different direction of development, which makes  quite unrealistic  your sayings.

I would say difficult, but not unrealistic. In any case, this has been exactly my concern.

-jiri



--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/