[Users] RHEL/Fedora equivalents of deb packages in RPM SPEC

[Peter Nixon]

Hi Guys

The reason I have not yet gotten the new rpms up is because of the new 
dependency on xmlrpc-c which is very broken on 64bit. I spent several hours 
on it last week, but still haven't got everything building correctly and ran 
out of time. I will try to have a look at it again in the next few days..

-Peter

On Wed 21 Mar 2007 16:23, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Peter Nixon did great job with RPM packaging in the past. I have seen
> that some 1.2.0 RPMs are now available on opensuse mirror (it has RPMs
> for many distros, not only SUSE):
>
> http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/telephony/openSUSE_10.2/i586
>/
>
> http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/telephony/
>
> I couldn't spot any of new included packages. I have no RMPs based
> distro to play with it at my wish by now, I did blind update of specs.
> Maybe he can give some update of his plans.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 03/20/07 21:34, Alan Crosswell wrote:
> > The BuildPrereq lines in the RPM SPEC file for Fedora Core
> > (openser.spec.fedora) supplied with 1.2.0 references debian names for
> > the package (e.g. libxml2-dev -> libxml2-devel).  Before I waste too
> > much time finding the equivalent RHEL and/or Fedora Core packages that
> > do the job, I thought I would ask her if anyone else has done so.
> >
> > If not, I'll make sure to submit patches for the SPECs once I figure
> > them out.  I am really looking to build on RHEL4 but clearly will need
> > to grab some RPMs from Fedora Core....
> >
> > Please no religious rants about Debian vs. RHEL vs. Fedora vs. SuSE and
> > so on:-)
> >
> > /a
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc