[Users] CANCEL problem

[Michael Ulitskiy]

Hi Bogdan,

It seems to work perfect now. Thanks a lot.
I've given it a limited testing so far, but I'll definitely let you
know if I notice any problems with it.
Thanks again,

Michael

On Tuesday 16 August 2005 11:17 am, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I found and fixed the problem - I was able to reproduce in a testbed the 
> scenario and to properly test it. Let me know if it work ok for you also.
> 
> regards,
> bogdan
> 
> Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> 
> >Bogdan,
> >
> >The problem is still there and actually I can't see any difference.
> >
> > 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060
> > 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: looked up: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060 flags: 00000040
> > 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060: RELAYING to sip:192.168.76.250:1083 (flags: 00000040)...
> > 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060
> > 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: looked up: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060 flags: 00000040
> > 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060: RELAYING to sip:192.168.76.250:1083 (flags: 00000040)...
> > 0(14899) ACK: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060
> > 0(14899) <null>: cseq=102: onreply_route_log: received: 100 Trying from 192.168.76.250:1083
> > 0(14899) <null>: cseq=102: onreply_route_log: received: 180 Ringing from 192.168.76.250:1083
> >
> >ngrep shows that CANCEL is never get sent to the user xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.76.250:1083
> >
> >Michael
> >
> >On Monday 15 August 2005 01:03 pm, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Hi Michael,
> >>
> >>I added in TM some code which should solve this problem - unfortunately 
> >>is not tested yet since the scenario is quite difficult to reproduce.
> >>Can you please give it a try a report de output - crash, the same or 
> >>success?
> >>
> >>thanks and regards,
> >>bogdan
> >>
> >>Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Great! Thanks Bogdan! I'll be the first to test it.
> >>>I just wanted to point out that it's really amusing how responsive
> >>>openser developers are and how impressive openser development
> >>>pace is. Very good experience so far.
> >>>Thanks a lot.
> >>>
> >>>Michael
> >>>
> >>>On Wednesday 03 August 2005 11:32 am, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Michael,
> >>>>
> >>>>that's exactly the trick I wanted to try to solve this issue (see my 
> >>>>previous email)...but I will have to dig to see how difficult is to 
> >>>>implement.
> >>>>
> >>>>regards,
> >>>>bogdan
> >>>>        
> >>>>
>