[Users] CANCEL problem

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Michael,

I found and fixed the problem - I was able to reproduce in a testbed the 
scenario and to properly test it. Let me know if it work ok for you also.

regards,
bogdan

Michael Ulitskiy wrote:

>Bogdan,
>
>The problem is still there and actually I can't see any difference.
>
> 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060
> 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: looked up: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060 flags: 00000040
> 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060: RELAYING to sip:192.168.76.250:1083 (flags: 00000040)...
> 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060
> 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: looked up: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060 flags: 00000040
> 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.0.249:5060: RELAYING to sip:192.168.76.250:1083 (flags: 00000040)...
> 0(14899) ACK: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060
> 0(14899) <null>: cseq=102: onreply_route_log: received: 100 Trying from 192.168.76.250:1083
> 0(14899) <null>: cseq=102: onreply_route_log: received: 180 Ringing from 192.168.76.250:1083
>
>ngrep shows that CANCEL is never get sent to the user xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.76.250:1083
>
>Michael
>
>On Monday 15 August 2005 01:03 pm, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi Michael,
>>
>>I added in TM some code which should solve this problem - unfortunately 
>>is not tested yet since the scenario is quite difficult to reproduce.
>>Can you please give it a try a report de output - crash, the same or 
>>success?
>>
>>thanks and regards,
>>bogdan
>>
>>Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Great! Thanks Bogdan! I'll be the first to test it.
>>>I just wanted to point out that it's really amusing how responsive
>>>openser developers are and how impressive openser development
>>>pace is. Very good experience so far.
>>>Thanks a lot.
>>>
>>>Michael
>>>
>>>On Wednesday 03 August 2005 11:32 am, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>>that's exactly the trick I wanted to try to solve this issue (see my 
>>>>previous email)...but I will have to dig to see how difficult is to 
>>>>implement.
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>bogdan
>>>>        
>>>>