[SR-Users] Kamailio stops processing requests mid script

Joel Serrano joel at textplus.com
Tue Sep 20 07:25:23 CEST 2022


Hey guys,

I wanted to report back, after replacing the "return(0)" with "return(-1)"
as Patrick pointed out my config script now continues as it used to on
v5.5.2 with no more issues.

Thanks for the help!

Joel.

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 8:26 AM Patrick Karton <patrickarton at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> You should return -1 or any négative number instead of 0 in route ABC if
> you want the calling block to continue.
>
> Return 0 will end kamailio script. Its équivalent to exit in 5.6.1 and
> even 5.5.4 if i remember.
>
> Le 16 sept. 2022 15:48, Joel Serrano <joel at textplus.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> So after a lot of digging, this is my finding so far:
>
> Chronology:
>
> current Kamailio v5.5.2 - everything works
> update to Kamailio v5.6.1 - issue begins
> downgrade to Kamailio v5.5.4 - issue continues
>
> That got me triggered, so I added a lot of debug logs to see where I was
> getting stuck.
>
> the last point in the script I get to is something similar to:
>
> if(route(ABC)) {
>     ... do stuff ...
> }
>
>
> Having:
>
> route[ABC] {
>     if(condition) {
>         return(1);
>     } else {
>         return(0);
>     }
> }
>
>
> Right after doing the route(ABC) the call ends.
>
> I've done a diff from 5.5.2 to 5.5.4 and I think this commit could be
> related:
>
>
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/b149906e3c0558fd9cb866d39b36f180efaef656
>
>
> @Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> any tips? Do I need to
> rework my config and stop using the logic were a child route can return(1)
> or return(0) to parent route? I think that when I return(0) effectively the
> call is ending.
>
> I don't see kamailio v5.5.2 in the repo any more are they available? I
> could downgrade to 5.5.2 to confirm this 100%, but I think I'm finally
> getting to the root cause.
>
> root at csbc01:~# apt-cache policy kamailio
> kamailio:
>   Installed: 5.5.4+bpo10
>   Candidate: 5.5.4+bpo10
>   Version table:
>  *** 5.5.4+bpo10 500
>         500 http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio55 buster/main amd64 Packages
>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>      5.2.1-1 500
>         500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian buster/main amd64 Packages
> root at csbc01:~#
>
>
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
> Joel.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 9:50 AM Joel Serrano <joel at textplus.com> wrote:
>
> In sngrep I do see the the INVITEs coming in, I’ll check more on the OS
> side and see what I can find.
>
> Again, thanks for checking! I’ll follow up with what I find.
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:16 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> if the traffic is over UDP, the Kamailio workers were blocked in
> recvfrom(), meaning that nothing is passed from the network layer to them.
> If you see UDP packets coming to Kamailio via ngrep/sngrep/..., then is the
> OS that drops them via firewall or some other app that controls the network
> traffic.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 15.09.22 07:37, Joel Serrano wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I've tried with apparmor disabled unfortunately the same issue happens.
>
> I've sent you privately the output of the kamctl trap. I personally don't
> think it's Kamailio's fault per se, this is on a standard debian 11. I'm
> just lost and don't really understand what the hell is going on.
>
> Thanks, I appreciate your help with this.
> Joel.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 9:50 AM Joel Serrano <joel at textplus.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I've followed your suggestions and compared this "bad" server with the two
> "good" ones.
>
> - Pike:
>
> In all cases we have:
>
>     if (src_ip!=myself && !ds_is_from_list()) {
>         if($sht(ipban=>$si)!=$null) {
>             xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: blocked by pike R=$ru from $fu
> (IP:$si:$sp)\n");
>             exit;
>         }
>         if (!pike_check_req()) {
>             xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: pike blocking R=$ru from $fu
> (IP:$si:$sp)\n");
>             $sht(ipban=>$si) = 1;
>             exit;
>         }
>     }
>
> And we are not seeing any logs, therefore I'm discarding pike.
>
> - Firewall:
>
> I checked all 3 servers, and none of them have -local- firewall policies.
>
> - conntrack:
>
> All 3 servers have nf_conntrack loaded in kernel.
>
> - selinux/etc:
>
> The two good servers have "AppArmor" disabled.
> The bad server has "AppArmor" enabled. !!!!!!!!!!!!!! <---------- I'm
> hoping this could be the cause and I'm going to test tonight without it.
>
>
> Thanks for checking this, I was so lost I actually went ahead and did
> "kamctl trap" last night too just in case. When I run it, it didn't stop by
> itself (I stopped it with CTRL+C after some time) but it did generate a
> file with a lot of output. Can I send you it privately? I'm not sure how to
> interpret it.
>
> Before anything I'm going to test tonight:
>
> 1- disabling apparmor
> 2- unloading nf_conntrack
>
> I'll report back with the resutls.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:27 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> be sure you do not hit some limits set by Kamailio (e.g., pike) or the
> system/firewall (e.g., selinux, conntrack).
>
> You should install gdb and run "kamctl trap" when it stops processing and
> inspect the written file to see where each kamailio process is in the
> execution stack.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 14.09.22 10:20, Joel Serrano wrote:
>
> Bumping this! Any comments? Or suggestions on what to check? I'm feeling
> it has to be something stupid but I can't see it :(
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:56 AM Joel Serrano <joel at textplus.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a cluster of 2 kamailios v5.5 on debian 9 working flawlessly.
>
> We have added a third node, also on v5.5 but debian 11. Kamailio doesn't
> work correctly for some reason that I'm not seeing.
>
> The symptoms are:
>
> 1- Kamailio receives INVITEs and starts to process them per routing script.
> 2- There is a specific place where something happens and the calls are
> dropped (Kamailio is not even replying to the source). Note that the config
> is exactly the same on all 3 servers, only one of the three is having the
> issue.
>
> I enabled debug logs and I could see:
>
> [...]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.example.com} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[GET_OUTBOUND_API_DATA]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/api.cfg] l=61 a=5 n=route
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.example.com} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[APPLY_REWRITE_RULE]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/extras.cfg] l=211 a=26 n=xlog
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: INFO: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <script>: Applying
> local to toll-free rewrite rules on callee number using dpid '20'
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[APPLY_REWRITE_RULE]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/extras.cfg] l=212 a=63 n=assign
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[APPLY_REWRITE_RULE]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/extras.cfg] l=219 a=16 n=if
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[APPLY_REWRITE_RULE]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/extras.cfg] l=213 a=26 n=dp_translate
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dialplan.c:237]: dp_get_ivalue(): searching 15
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dialplan.c:245]: dp_get_ivalue(): dpid is 20 from pv argument
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dialplan.c:254]: dp_get_svalue(): searching 15
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dialplan.c:350]: dp_translate_f(): input is 67339924
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:605]: dp_translate_helper(): regex operator testing over
> [67339924]
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dp_repl.c:676]: dp_translate_helper(): no matching rule
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialplan
> [dialplan.c:354]: dp_translate_f(): could not translate 67339924 with dpid
> 20
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[APPLY_REWRITE_RULE]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/extras.cfg] l=217 a=26 n=xlog
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: INFO: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <script>: No
> matching rewrite rules for '67339924' found
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[APPLY_REWRITE_RULE]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/extras.cfg] l=218 a=2 n=return
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/receive.c:514]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 12245 usec
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:785]: dlg_lookup_mode(): ref dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1 -> 2
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:789]: dlg_lookup_mode(): dialog id=8614 found on entry 343
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_var.c:63]: dlg_cfg_cb(): new dialog with no transaction after config
> execution
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1091]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref op on 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1
> from dlg_hash.c:1109
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1095]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1 -> 1
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1091]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref op on 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1
> from dlg_hash.c:1109
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1095]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1 -> 0
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1095]: dlg_unref_helper(): ref <=0 for dialog 0x7ff1b4884b48
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:345]: destroy_dlg(): destroying dialog 0x7ff1b4884b48 (ref 0)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:356]: destroy_dlg(): removed timer for dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48
> [343:8614] with clid '
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa' and tags
> 'as5d31c96b' ''
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_db_handler.c:708]: remove_dialog_from_db(): trying to remove dialog [
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa], update_flag is
> 1024
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [db_query.c:72]: db_do_submit_query(): submitted query: delete from
> `dialog` where `hash_entry`=343 AND `hash_id`=8614, result 0
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [db_query.c:72]: db_do_submit_query(): submitted query: delete from
> `dialog_vars` where `hash_entry`=343 AND `hash_id`=8614, result 0
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_db_handler.c:736]: remove_dialog_from_db(): callid was
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list 0x7ff1b4880370
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/xavp.c:541]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/xavp.c:541]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/xavp.c:541]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/receive.c:606]: receive_msg(): cleaning up
>
> If I go to line 61 from route GET_OUTBOUND_API_DATA, I have this:
>
>     if(route(APPLY_REWRITE_RULE)) {
>         $rU = $var(dp_user);
>         $avp(icx_real_number) = $var(dp_user);
>     }
>
> The very next thing is:
>
>     # Query API
>     $avp(apiUrl) = "{{ call_api_url }}/outbound/" + $avp(icx_src_number) +
> "/" + $avp(icx_real_number);
>     http_client_query("$avp(apiUrl)", "$avp(apiResponseBody)");
>     $avp(apiResponseCode) = $rc;
>
> I see the GET_OUTBOUND_API_DATA route calling APPLY_REWRITE_RULE, and
> APPLY_REWRITE_RULE returning correctly then finished:
>
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: exec: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} ***
> cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[APPLY_REWRITE_RULE]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/sbc/extras.cfg] l=218 a=2 n=return
>
> But then Kamailio is apparently just tearing down the call and ending it.
>
> Can someone help me understand what this part of the logs means or what
> can be causing them?
>
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/receive.c:514]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 12245 usec
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:785]: dlg_lookup_mode(): ref dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1 -> 2
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:789]: dlg_lookup_mode(): dialog id=8614 found on entry 343
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_var.c:63]: dlg_cfg_cb(): new dialog with no transaction after config
> execution
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1091]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref op on 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1
> from dlg_hash.c:1109
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1095]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1 -> 1
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1091]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref op on 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1
> from dlg_hash.c:1109
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1095]: dlg_unref_helper(): unref dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48 with 1 -> 0
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1095]: dlg_unref_helper(): ref <=0 for dialog 0x7ff1b4884b48
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:345]: destroy_dlg(): destroying dialog 0x7ff1b4884b48 (ref 0)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:356]: destroy_dlg(): removed timer for dlg 0x7ff1b4884b48
> [343:8614] with clid '
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa' and tags
> 'as5d31c96b' ''
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_db_handler.c:708]: remove_dialog_from_db(): trying to remove dialog [
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa], update_flag is
> 1024
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [db_query.c:72]: db_do_submit_query(): submitted query: delete from
> `dialog` where `hash_entry`=343 AND `hash_id`=8614, result 0
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [db_query.c:72]: db_do_submit_query(): submitted query: delete from
> `dialog_vars` where `hash_entry`=343 AND `hash_id`=8614, result 0
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} dialog
> [dlg_db_handler.c:736]: remove_dialog_from_db(): callid was
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list 0x7ff1b4880370
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/usr_avp.c:637]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/xavp.c:541]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/xavp.c:541]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/xavp.c:541]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil)
> Sep 10 12:30:48 sbc03 sbc[956340]: DEBUG: {1 102 INVITE
> 5111a7c71ec485e443099844491ef7d8 at sip02.vozelia.com.pa} <core>
> [core/receive.c:606]: receive_msg(): cleaning up
>
> I can see it's related to the dialogs, but is this a cause or a
> consequence? I have checked the API access logs, and Kamailio doesn't get
> to send the request, I've also noticed that normally Kamailio replies with
> a 100-Trying almost instantly, in the case of this server I don't see a
> single 100-Trying from Kamailio.
>
> I'm pretty lost here so any tips are more than welcome.
>
> NOTE: I tried with debian11 + Kamailio 5.6 and the same issue happens too.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Joel.
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>   * sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>   * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>   * sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
> the sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>   * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20220919/aa9d80ba/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list