[SR-Users] More than TCP 800 concurrent calls, slows Kamailio (LUA FILE API REQUESTS)
Giovanni Jose
gio.jose at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 22:15:48 CEST 2022
Hello again,
Ok I was able to resolve the load issue and yes asynchronous processing is
improving this A LOT, but now I am having issues with the ACK's as soon I
am getting an ACK request I am having this error
106(112) ERROR: * cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY]
c=[/etc/kamailio/ccm-next-main.cfg] l=141 a=24 n=t_relay
106(112) INFO: tm [t_lookup.c:1333]: t_newtran(): attempt to create
transaction for a faked request - try to avoid it
106(112) WARNING: tm [t_reply.c:1583]: t_retransmit_reply(): WARNING:
t_retransmit_reply: no resolved dst to retransmit
106(112) ERROR: * cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY]
c=[/etc/kamailio/ccm-next-main.cfg] l=144 a=2 n=exit
I think the problem could be because the t_newtran() is now working
properly with the ACKs so, as soon this is going to t_relay() fails.
route[RELAY_API] {
$http_req(all) = $null;
$http_req(suspend) = 0;
$http_req(timeout) = 3000;
$http_req(method) = "POST";
$http_req(hdr) = "Content-Type: application/json";
$http_req(hdr) = "Authorization: Bearer $sht(token=>new_token)";
jansson_set("obj", "network", '{"srcIP":"$fd"}',
"$var(http_routing_query)");
jansson_set("string", "callID", $ci, "$var(http_routing_query)");
jansson_set("string", "sip", $mb, "$var(http_routing_query)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm API ASYNC ROUTING REQUEST:
$var(http_routing_query)\n");
$http_req(body) = $var(http_routing_query);
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
xlog("L_INFO","BEFORE $rm INIT_CALL_API $var(call_request):
$var(http_routing_query)\n");
if (!t_newtran()) {
sl_reply_error();
exit();
}
http_async_query("http:// API_END_POINT /init",
"INIT_RELAY_API_RESPONSE");
}
if ( is_method("ACK|BYE|INFO") ) {
xlog("L_INFO","BEFORE $rm DIALOG_CALL_API $var(call_request):
$var(http_routing_query)\n");
if (!t_newtran()) {
sl_reply_error();
exit();
}
http_async_query("http://API_END_POINT", "RELAY");
}
}
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 8:19 AM Henning Westerholt <hw at gilawa.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> please keep the list in CC, that others can comment as well.
>
>
>
> Beside from the obvious (improving the performance of the lua API call),
> you could use indeed asynchronous processing. If you just use the lua code
> to emit the REST request, using a native http client module would be
> probably also faster as doing it over lua.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> --
>
> Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
>
> Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Giovanni Jose <gio.jose at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 30, 2022 5:17 PM
> *To:* Henning Westerholt <hw at gilawa.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] More than TCP 800 concurrent calls, slows
> Kamailio (LUA FILE API REQUESTS)
>
>
>
> Hello Henning, Thanks so much for the fast response
>
> I just commented the loop and I was hitting the backend and it's slow
> anyway maybe it's because, for this type of implementation when the
> destination of the call is decided by the API backend, I need to use
> the http_async_client module? I am noticing that for high volume calls
> kamailio slows the traffic and shows errors because there's a delay that is
> been added when the backend responds for every call.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:53 PM Henning Westerholt <hw at gilawa.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> why are you sleeping for 1s in the loop? This will cause Kamailio to block
> processing. I also do not see any stop condition on the loop, so it will
> loop until the limit.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> --
>
> Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
>
> Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of *Giovanni
> Jose
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2022 9:46 PM
> *To:* sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> *Subject:* [SR-Users] More than TCP 800 concurrent calls, slows Kamailio
> (LUA FILE API REQUESTS)
>
>
>
> Hello Guys I am having this issue where kamailio is receiving requests
> from SIPp (we are currently testing the platform and doing QA) but if we do
> more than 800 concurrent calls kamailio starts failing and slowing the
> requests, The scenario is the following:
>
>
>
> I am sending 5000 calls at 100 CPS on TCP and I am having this route in
> the configuration file:
>
> # Handle the calls to api
> route[CALL_API] {
> xlog("L_NOTICE"," Call request $var(call_request) method: $rm \n");
> $var(loop_true)=1;
> while ($var(loop_true)) {
>
> if(!lua_run("call_request","$var(call_request)","$sht(token=>new_token)")) {
> xlog("L_NOTICE", "SCRIPT: failed to execute lua function!\n");
> }
> if ($var(loop_true)){
> sleep("1");
> }
> }
> xlog("L_NOTICE", "SCRIPT: Sucess to execute lua function!\n");
> }
>
>
>
> So I am executing a LUA script for the requests and the API response will
> tell the destination of the call.
>
> At 800 concurrent calls, I can notice SLOWLINESS in the SIPp testing tool,
> and then I will start receiving 408 timeouts.
>
> This sounds like a load issue or something because I believe there's a
> time that it's been added every time we hit the backend and wait for the
> response.
>
>
>
> any help will be appreciated
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Gio
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20220405/08aa6de0/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list