[SR-Users] which is better for B2BUA

[Karsten Horsmann]

Hello,

just for the records:

You can also bypass media with FreeSWITCH if you want. The overall handling
of many parallel calls is still not so high like in SEMS.

https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/Proxy+Media
This is also possible on a per Call base.

And you can use different profiles as well in FreeSWITCH.

Asterisk Experts will have more knowledge what is possible there, and maybe
someone told us whats going on with Yate.

Kind regards
Karsten

Am Di., 13. Juli 2021 um 10:11 Uhr schrieb Mojtaba <mespio at gmail.com>:

>
> Hello there,
> According to ,
> https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-March/092058.html,
> which talked about  B2BUA (just signalling) in Kamailio.
> As i have experienced working with SEMS, freeswitch and Kamailio while
> using B2BUA feature, Each of them have pros and cons:
> 1- The sems is a light sip engine server with several applications (like
> as sbc) for using b2bua. All incoming and outgoing calls could go to sems
> server for doing b2bua like this:
>
> Incoming<=======>Kamailio<========>Sems<========>Kamailio<=======>outgoing
>
> 2- In sems, you could disable rtp realying. It forces sems to work just as
> b2bua without anchoring RTP
> 3- Easy to use different active profiles in routing.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20210727/28405a85/attachment.htm>