[SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage and AWS

[Aymeric Moizard]

Hi,

A bit of debug in rtpproxy: I found out that if I use  -l 10.10.111.234
instead of  -l 0.0.0.0 in the command line, it's working as expected.

I'm not able to understand if this is a bug, or an expected behavior.

Sorry that I answered my question alone ;)
Regards
Aymeric

Le jeu. 24 sept. 2020 à 17:49, Aymeric Moizard <amoizard at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> A bit more information on the rtpproxy and kamailio exchange: this is what
> I receive on rtpproxy (2.1.0)
>
> DBUG:GLOBAL:get_command: received command "11479_4 Uc18,8,0,101 109865504
> 90.66.177.103 30250 4178279503;1"
> INFO:GLOBAL:rtpp_command_ul_handle: new IPv4/IPv4 session 109865504, tag
> 4178279503;1 requested, type strong
> INFO:109865504:rtpp_command_ul_handle: new session on IPv4 port 51694
> created, tag 4178279503;1
>
> Regards,
> Aymeric
>
>
> Le jeu. 24 sept. 2020 à 15:33, Aymeric Moizard <amoizard at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have 2 hosts on AWS behind NAT:
>>
>> One with rtpproxy:
>>
>> /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -f -p /run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.pid -s udp:
>> 0.0.0.0:31500 -A 15.236.230.177 <http://15.236.230.177/15.236.230.177> -l
>> 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0> -m 35000 -M 65000 -d DBUG:LOG_LOCAL5 -u
>> rtpproxy:rtpproxy -F
>>
>> The other one, with a kamailio and using only rtpproxy_manage(); without
>> parameters.
>>
>> I'm surprised because in my SDP being modified, kamailio is replacing
>> with its KAMILIO private IP. (not the rtpproxy one)
>>
>> I see that rtpproxy and kamailio are exchanging data. Nothing obvious
>> is coming out.
>>
>> Any obvious mistakes?
>> Anything you need to help?
>> Should I switch to another rtp engine?
>>
>> Regards
>> Aymeric
>>
>> --
>> Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
>


-- 
Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200924/fbec5996/attachment.htm>