[SR-Users] dialog_active_dialogs erroneous value

[Sergiu Pojoga]

Sorry to insist but... looks like it's not just the active_dialogs stats
that's messed up. Early_dialogs are also often erroneous and the dialog
counters don't match against different RPCs.

What would the devs like me to do with this: drop it, open another GitHub
issue?

# kamcmd dlg.stats_active && kamcmd stats.get_statistics all | grep dialog
{
 starting: 0
 connecting: 0
 answering: 0
 ongoing: 2
 all: 2
}
dialog:active_dialogs = 20
dialog:early_dialogs = 18446744073709551614
dialog:expired_dialogs = 0
dialog:failed_dialogs = 6978
dialog:processed_dialogs = 11248

# kamcmd dmq.list_nodes
{
 host: 65.xx.xx.11
 port: 5062
 resolved_ip: 65.xx.xx.11
 status: active
 last_notification: 0
 local: 0
}
{
 host: 65.xx.xx.22
 port: 5062
 resolved_ip: 65.xx.xx.22
 status: active
 last_notification: 0
 local: 1
}

# kamailio -v
version: kamailio 5.3.4 (x86_64/linux) fc28a1

Thanks.
--Sergiu

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 5:10 PM Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joel,
>
> Thanks, that's precisely it!
>
> Indeed, `dlg.stats_active` works correctly and what's nice about it is
> that it shows stats summary from all DMQ nodes combined. However, I
> use xHTTP_PROM module to export my stats, which seems to rely on the
> 'problematic' counters. Sad... Let's hope this gets resolved one day.
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:17 PM Joel Serrano <joel at textplus.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Sergiu,
>>
>> I think I've been through a similar case... have a look at:
>> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1591 in case you find it
>> helpful.
>>
>> You might have to rely on the different metric that Daniel added.
>>
>> Joel.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 3:35 AM Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> You guessed right, two dmq nodes with dialog replication.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri., Oct. 16, 2020, 2:15 a.m. Daniel-Constantin Mierla, <
>>> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> is this happening when using dmq for dialog with multiple sip servers?
>>>> Or is a single instance sip server?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>> On 16.10.20 04:12, Sergiu Pojoga wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> Every now and then, the value of active dialogs metric spikes to an
>>>> erroneous huge number, messing up my otherwise beautiful grafana gauges :(
>>>>
>>>> Example:
>>>> kamailio_dialog_active_dialogs 18446744073709551614 1602812239115
>>>> kamailio_dialog_early_dialogs 0 1602812239115
>>>> kamailio_dialog_expired_dialogs 2 1602812239115
>>>> kamailio_dialog_failed_dialogs 7361 1602812239115
>>>>
>>>> Anybody faced the same symptoms, any clues what might be causing this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --Sergiu
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>> Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20201019/49ba58cc/attachment.htm>