[SR-Users] How to ensure separate kamailio instances dispatchers make the same decision?

[Karsten Horsmann]

Hi Georg,

setid is not an autoincrement.

See the DB structure information (should be to your version)
https://kamailio.org/docs/db-tables/kamailio-db-5.1.x.html#idm1963

I group my targets with the setid. That's maybe the name "sets of id's"

So all with the same id would be taken if the are active and how you call
them from your kamailio.cfg.

The other question is an implementation one. I don't understand the problem
completely.

Cheers
Karsten


George Diamantopoulos <georgediam at gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 20. Mai 2020,
19:42:

> Hello all,
>
> I need to have two separate kamailio instances' dispatcher modules make
> the same decisions when using algorithm 7 (hash over pvar). What do I need
> to do to ensure this?
>
> Note that for design reasons, the two instances cannot share a dispatcher
> table from db. If I ensure the "setid" group used for algo 7 in the
> respective cases contain the same group of hosts, is it enough? Do other
> things matter, such as the ordering of the group members in the table (i.e.
> different AUTO INCREMENT ids?). Does the setid need to be the same number?
> Do I need to ensure the 'destination' values are identical (i.e. not using
> IPs for dispatcher table A and hostnames for dispatcher table B)?
>
> If someone knows what the criteria is for matching a hashed pvar to a
> member of a dispatcher setid and how this can be made deterministic, I
> would be grateful. Thanks!
>
> BR,
> George
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200520/81eed8f2/attachment.html>