[SR-Users] Database errors with usrloc db_mode=1 and dmq_usrloc

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Mon Feb 24 10:36:03 CET 2020


Hello,

the error message:

Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
db_use_table(): invalid parameter value

Is printed if the database table name is not given as parameter (eg,
null or empty). I pushed a patch to usrloc to print the table in the log
message, can you try with latest master (or patch from next commit) and
send again the log messages?

  *
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/3843ae18599bfc1806ccb62df44bbc8ad41d60dd

Cheers,
Daniel

On 21.02.20 22:40, Joel Serrano wrote:
> Hello, 
>
> I have a setup with 2 kamailio in active/idle, locations are shared
> via dmq_usrloc, but database is also used as a cache where other
> systems can access and query "real-time" data.
>
> The config we have is:
>
> # ----- usrloc params -----
> modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL)
> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1)
> modparam("usrloc", "db_load", 0)
> modparam("usrloc", "db_insert_update", 1)
> modparam("usrloc", "db_timer_clean", 1)
> modparam("usrloc", "server_id_filter", 1)
> modparam("usrloc", "timer_procs", 2)
> modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 60)
>
> # ----- dmq_usrloc params -----
> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1)
> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1)
> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_msg_contacts", 50)  # 50 contacts / message
> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 10000)       # 10000 contacts / batch
> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 500000)    # one batch every 500ms
>
> With this setup, we assume:
>
> 1- almost real-time updated location info in the database.
> 2- as long as one of the two Kam is up, location information will not
> be lost (as they will sync with each other via DMQ)
> 3- if both servers go down, locations are lost (as they will not
> reload from database on startup).
>
> Our tests work well with the above config, with one exception, on the
> idle node, we see a lot of (only happens on the node receiving
> location via dmq):
>
> Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
> db_use_table(): invalid parameter value
> Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1136]:
> db_update_ucontact_ruid(): sql use_table failed
> Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1657]:
> update_contact_db(): failed to update database
>
> I added debug logs to see if I could understand the reason:
>
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:478]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message received
> from sip:usrloc at 10.2.1.181:5050 <http://sip:usrloc@10.2.1.181:5050>
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:423]: usrloc_dmq_execute_action(): Received DMQ_UPDATE.
> Update contact info...
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:75]: add_contact(): aor: 1063362
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:76]: add_contact(): ci->ruid: uloc-1-5e502cd3-5629-1
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:77]: add_contact(): aorhash: 928261667
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:115]: add_contact(): '1063362' Not found in usrloc
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:117]: add_contact(): Insert record
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:83]:
> run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7fe41ff41f40, callback type 1/15, id 0
> entered
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:800]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=1
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:826]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received from DMQ...
> skip
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
> db_use_table(): invalid parameter value
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:669]:
> db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:598]:
> insert_ucontact(): failed to insert in database
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:121]: add_contact(): Insert ucontact
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:124]: add_contact(): Release record
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc
> [usrloc_sync.c:126]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:305]:
> send_reply(): reply in stateless mode (sl)
> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: <core>
> [core/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (10.2.1.181,
> 10.2.1.181, 0)
>
> Can anyone help me understand what's the problem? I have the server_id
> setting, and the modparam server_id_filter, so shouldn't the receiving
> node just ignore any database tasks?
>
>
> Thanks, 
> Joel.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200224/cddf4d3c/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list