[SR-Users] Database errors with usrloc db_mode=1 and dmq_usrloc

Joel Serrano joel at textplus.com
Fri Feb 21 22:40:06 CET 2020


Hello,

I have a setup with 2 kamailio in active/idle, locations are shared via
dmq_usrloc, but database is also used as a cache where other systems can
access and query "real-time" data.

The config we have is:

# ----- usrloc params -----
modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "db_load", 0)
modparam("usrloc", "db_insert_update", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "db_timer_clean", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "server_id_filter", 1)
modparam("usrloc", "timer_procs", 2)
modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 60)

# ----- dmq_usrloc params -----
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_msg_contacts", 50)  # 50 contacts / message
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 10000)       # 10000 contacts / batch
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 500000)    # one batch every 500ms

With this setup, we assume:

1- almost real-time updated location info in the database.
2- as long as one of the two Kam is up, location information will not be
lost (as they will sync with each other via DMQ)
3- if both servers go down, locations are lost (as they will not reload
from database on startup).

Our tests work well with the above config, with one exception, on the idle
node, we see a lot of (only happens on the node receiving location via dmq):

Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
db_use_table(): invalid parameter value
Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1136]:
db_update_ucontact_ruid(): sql use_table failed
Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1657]:
update_contact_db(): failed to update database

I added debug logs to see if I could understand the reason:

Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:478]:
usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message received from
sip:usrloc at 10.2.1.181:5050
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:423]:
usrloc_dmq_execute_action(): Received DMQ_UPDATE. Update contact info...
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:75]:
add_contact(): aor: 1063362
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:76]:
add_contact(): ci->ruid: uloc-1-5e502cd3-5629-1
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:77]:
add_contact(): aorhash: 928261667
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:115]:
add_contact(): '1063362' Not found in usrloc
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:117]:
add_contact(): Insert record
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:83]:
run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7fe41ff41f40, callback type 1/15, id 0 entered
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:800]:
dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=1
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:826]:
dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received from DMQ... skip
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]:
db_use_table(): invalid parameter value
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:669]:
db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:598]:
insert_ucontact(): failed to insert in database
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:121]:
add_contact(): Insert ucontact
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:124]:
add_contact(): Release record
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:126]:
add_contact(): Unlock udomain
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:305]: send_reply():
reply in stateless mode (sl)
Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: <core>
[core/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (10.2.1.181, 10.2.1.181,
0)

Can anyone help me understand what's the problem? I have the server_id
setting, and the modparam server_id_filter, so shouldn't the receiving node
just ignore any database tasks?


Thanks,
Joel.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200221/abcc2e2c/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list