[SR-Users] doubt about xflags
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 14:10:02 CEST 2020
Hello,
that change was pushed to 5.3 at that moment, as I wrote in the email.
If you still get the issue with branch 5.3, let me know.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 06.04.20 10:48, David Escartin wrote:
> Dear Daniel
>
> hope everything is ok.
> Sorry if i missed something, but this was changed already backported
> from master to 5.3 yet?
>
> thanks alot and regards
> david
>
> El vie., 21 feb. 2020 a las 11:20, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> (<miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>) escribió:
>
> Hello,
>
> ok, good to know works fine now! Thanks for troubleshooting and
> testing.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 21.02.20 10:11, David Escartin wrote:
>> hello Daniel
>>
>> I made a try on the latest master branch commit and seems ok now
>> thanks a lot!
>>
>> david
>>
>>
>> El vie., 21 feb. 2020 a las 8:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> (<miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>) escribió:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> good catch, I pushed a patch to propagate xflags on
>> msg_apply_changes() in master and backported to 5.3 and 5.2.
>> Give it a try with any of the branches and let me know if
>> works fine now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 21.02.20 08:29, David Escartin wrote:
>>> Hello Daniel
>>>
>>> i made some more tests and i could see that it's after
>>> executing msg_apply_changes function that the xflag is lost.
>>> The original message transaction flags remain activated
>>> after msg_apply_changes.
>>>
>>> i did an execution on debug but i saw no information more than
>>>
>>> 2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID
>>> 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171 <mailto:1-25549 at 1.1.18.171>: We activate
>>> TEST_XFLAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>> 2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID
>>> 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171 <mailto:1-25549 at 1.1.18.171>: TEST_XFLAG
>>> TRUE!!!!
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:3262]:
>>> sip_msg_update_buffer(): SIP message content updated - reparsing
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]:
>>> parse_msg(): SIP Request:
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]:
>>> parse_msg(): method: <INVITE>
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]:
>>> parse_msg(): uri: <sip:7777777 at 2.2.2.26:5060
>>> <http://sip:7777777@2.2.2.26:5060>>
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]:
>>> parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]:
>>> parse_via_param(): Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>;
>>> state=6
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]:
>>> parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> =
>>> <z9hG4bK-5aaf0472f30d11e68aeff8bc1239f520>; state=6
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]:
>>> parse_via_param(): Found param type 253, <sig> = <74e198e2>;
>>> state=16
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]:
>>> parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]:
>>> parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]:
>>> parse_headers(): this is the first via
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]:
>>> parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]:
>>> get_hdr_field(): <To> [83];
>>> uri=[sip:+9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173
>>> <mailto:sip%3A%2B9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173>;transport=udp;user=phone]
>>> 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]:
>>> get_hdr_field(): to body
>>> ["+0034355692006294"<sip:+9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173
>>> <mailto:sip%3A%2B9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173>;transport=udp;user=phone>
>>> ], to tag []
>>> 2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID
>>> 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171 <mailto:1-25549 at 1.1.18.171>: TEST_XFLAG
>>> after msg_apply_changes FALSE!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> david
>>>
>>> El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 20:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> (<miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>) escribió:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> have you set the flags before creating the transaction?
>>> Can you test if you set a normal flag and an xflag at
>>> the same place in request route, is the first visible in
>>> onreply route and the xflag not?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 20.02.20 18:05, David Escartin wrote:
>>>> Dear all
>>>>
>>>> one quick question, reading the module corex doc, seems
>>>> that xflag are message(transaction) flags. But I made a
>>>> test and seems for some reason the flag is not seeing
>>>> activated at the onreply_route, when it's activated on
>>>> the request route. Seemed more like a script flag
>>>> behaviour. Maybe I'm missing something?
>>>>
>>>> thanks a lot and regards
>>>> david
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>>> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com <http://www.kamailioworld.com>
>>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com <http://www.kamailioworld.com>
>>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com <http://www.kamailioworld.com>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200406/06b3f749/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list