[SR-Users] doubt about xflags

[David Escartin]

Dear Daniel

hope everything is ok.
Sorry if i missed something, but this was changed already backported from
master to 5.3 yet?

thanks  alot and regards
david

El vie., 21 feb. 2020 a las 11:20, Daniel-Constantin Mierla (<
miconda at gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hello,
>
> ok, good to know works fine now! Thanks for troubleshooting and testing.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 21.02.20 10:11, David Escartin wrote:
>
> hello Daniel
>
> I made a try on the latest master branch commit and seems ok now
> thanks a lot!
>
> david
>
>
> El vie., 21 feb. 2020 a las 8:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla (<
> miconda at gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> good catch, I pushed a patch to propagate xflags on msg_apply_changes()
>> in master and backported to 5.3 and 5.2. Give it a try with any of the
>> branches and let me know if works fine now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>> On 21.02.20 08:29, David Escartin wrote:
>>
>> Hello Daniel
>>
>> i made some more tests and i could see that it's after
>> executing msg_apply_changes function that the xflag is lost. The original
>> message transaction flags remain activated after msg_apply_changes.
>>
>> i did an execution on debug but i saw no information more than
>>
>>  2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171: We
>> activate TEST_XFLAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>  2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171:
>> TEST_XFLAG TRUE!!!!
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:3262]:
>> sip_msg_update_buffer(): SIP message content updated - reparsing
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): SIP
>> Request:
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg():
>>  method:  <INVITE>
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg():  uri:
>>     <sip:7777777 at 2.2.2.26:5060>
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]: parse_msg():
>>  version: <SIP/2.0>
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
>> Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
>> Found param type 232, <branch> =
>> <z9hG4bK-5aaf0472f30d11e68aeff8bc1239f520>; state=6
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
>> Found param type 253, <sig> = <74e198e2>; state=16
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end
>> of header reached, state=5
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>> Via found, flags=2
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers():
>> this is the first via
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]:
>> parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field():
>> <To> [83]; uri=[sip:+9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173
>> ;transport=udp;user=phone]
>>  2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]: get_hdr_field():
>> to body ["+0034355692006294"<sip:+9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173
>> ;transport=udp;user=phone>
>> ], to tag []
>>  2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171:
>> TEST_XFLAG after msg_apply_changes FALSE!!!!
>>
>>
>> best regards
>> david
>>
>> El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 20:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla (<
>> miconda at gmail.com>) escribió:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> have you set the flags before creating the transaction? Can you test if
>>> you set a normal flag and an xflag at the same place in request route, is
>>> the first visible in onreply route and the xflag not?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>> On 20.02.20 18:05, David Escartin wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> one quick question, reading the module corex doc, seems that xflag are
>>> message(transaction) flags. But I made a test and seems for some reason the
>>> flag is not seeing activated at the onreply_route, when it's activated on
>>> the request route. Seemed more like a script flag behaviour. Maybe I'm
>>> missing something?
>>>
>>> thanks a lot and regards
>>> david
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
>>> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
>>>
>>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
>> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200406/28af4793/attachment.html>