[SR-Users] tcp_accept_haproxy questions
Grant Bagdasarian
grantbagdasarian at gmail.com
Tue Oct 1 09:58:29 CEST 2019
Hi Henning,
Thanks.
Will do!
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 17:13 Henning Westerholt <hw at skalatan.de> wrote:
> Hello Grant,
>
>
>
> Activating it should not affect UDP transport – in fact these different
> protocols are done from individual Kamailio process (children).
>
>
>
> About the WebSockets Question – it should work but I am not aware that
> this was tested so far. Give it a try and please report back to the list.
> 😊
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> --
>
> Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
>
> Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of *Grant
> Bagdasarian
> *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2019 11:44 PM
> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
> *Subject:* [SR-Users] tcp_accept_haproxy questions
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> The docs mention regular TCP connections not being accepted anymore once
> this is enabled. I assume UDP is unaffected and both proxyprotocol and udp
> may live side by side?
>
>
>
> Also, does this play nicely with WebSockets? Taking into account the
> Websocket connection being setup through a proxy protocol supporting proxy.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Grant
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20191001/435e8413/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list