[SR-Users] Is DMQ now the recommended way to do things?

[Henning Westerholt]

Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2019, 19:00:32 CET schrieb * Paolo Visintin - 
> I'm using DMQ in order to share :
> - htable
> - usrloc
> 
> for usrloc seems everything working as expected.
> 
> on htable I have noticed, after some stresstest made with sipp (25 cps /
> 600 concurrent calls) that one of the nodes (or sometimes both) eat a lot
> of cpu (300%) after stresstest ended [all processes idle except f4 dmq
> handlers]; I tried also to change some parameters on dmq module like
> worker_usleep with no changes at all.

Hello Paolo,

just commenting on the first issue:

So I understood you correctly, after the stress-test you observe a not ending 
CPU load on the Kamailio server, even without load?

Maybe you can have a look on the CPU consuming processes by attaching e.g. 
"strace" to them at the next occasion, to see what they are doing.

Best regards,

Henning

> At last, using kamailio in a kubernetes system I have several kamailio
> instances that pops-up and then tiers down with different ips; for this
> reason dmq seems not able to delete peers, adding, for every defunct node a
> warning like this :
> router-3 17(34) ERROR: dmq [notification_peer.c:599]:
> notification_resp_callback_f(): deleting server
> sip:172.28.1.211:5062;status=active
> because of failed request
> router-1 router-sr 17(33) ERROR: dmq [notification_peer.c:599]:
> notification_resp_callback_f(): deleting server
> sip:172.28.1.213:5062;status=active
> because of failed request
> 
> Il giorno sab 26 gen 2019 alle ore 01:43 Alex Balashov <
> 
> abalashov at evaristesys.com> ha scritto:
> > I think the realistic answer is that it's getting to be that way. I
> > think DMQ is now the recommended way to share usrloc and htable across
> > multiple hosts. DMQ+dialog is still a work in progress. Not sure about
> > DMQ+some other new stuff.
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 04:21:43PM +0000, Canuck . wrote:
> > > Before DMQ there were other ways to do similar things.  Is DMQ now
> > > considered the best way? Assuming I am using recent stable?
> > > 
> > > Are there any good guides on clustering Kamailio?  I am not finding a
> > > lot of good info on that subject.  Specifically, for multi datacenter
> > > active active where things like floating IP's and keepalived are not
> > > really an option.

-- 
Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services
Kamailio security assessment - https://skalatan.de/de/assessment