[SR-Users] AWS binat external -> internal routing and record_route

[Dmitry Sytchev]

I've chosen that path with second port for internal traffic.
Not as cool as single port, but for now I found this simplifies my
config file flow. I haven't managed this to be done with conditions,
because it becomes harder when we decide about directions etc...

I'd be glad to know if you find other ways to do this!

ср, 16 янв. 2019 г. в 21:06, Joel Serrano <joel at textplus.com>:
>
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> I was wondering if you got this working? I'm facing a similar scenario and I don't know if it's worth going this path vs having a second port on internal IP without advertise just for internal traffic.... ?
>
> Thanks,
> Joel.
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:55 AM Dmitry Sytchev <kbdfck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I'm handling external IP with domain module, so I'm matching it
>> as 'myself'.
>> I'll try to do it this way.
>>
>> Thank you, Daniel!
>>
>> пн, 17 дек. 2018 г. в 14:49, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 17.12.18 12:37, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 17.12.18 11:38, Dmitry Sytchev wrote:
>> > >> Hi all!
>> > >> I have a question that arises in mailing list sometimes, but it is
>> > >> still not clear for me how to work with this.
>> > >>
>> > >> We have AWS instance with standard Amazon bi-nat, so basically
>> > >> communication with external hosts works with
>> > >> listen udp:ip:port advertise ip:port
>> > >>
>> > >> But in case when we need to send external call to internal network by
>> > >> internal ip addresses, we want to have internal host in record-route.
>> > >> As far as I understand, basic recommendation is to use separate port
>> > >> or internal address and select it with appropriate function.
>> > >>
>> > >> Maybe it is more theoretical question, but can we do something to
>> > >> generate correct record-routes and VIA for calls coming from external
>> > >> network to make their softswitches happy, and still maintain internal
>> > >> address in messages going to internal hosts, using single host and
>> > >> port on Kamailio behind nat?
>> > > you can do also without setting advertise address for a listen socket.
>> > > Just listen on local IP and then you have to use
>> > > set_advertise_address(...) to set the IP in Via and
>> > > record_route_preset(...) to set the Record-Route header.
>> > >
>> > > Only that the config becomes a bit more complex, you have to add IF
>> > > conditions when to add private or public IP addresses there.
>> >
>> > One thing I forgot: the public IP has to be treated as local IP (to
>> > match against 'myself'), so you have to do conditions on it -- either
>> > directly in the config conditions, or adding an alias or using domain
>> > module.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> > www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> > Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
>> > Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 -- www.asipto.com
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Dmitry Sytchev,
>> IT Engineer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users



-- 
Best regards,

Dmitry Sytchev,
IT Engineer