[SR-Users] crash at 480 reply to INVITE

[Juha Heinanen]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

> However, that had invalid access to transaction pointer. In this case,
> accessing transaction is ok, by setting a variable to the address of one
> of its fields, but then the variable becomes NULL, which is not possible
> unless the stack got corrupted/overwritten. However, from the moment of
> setting the variable till the moment of the crash, there are no other
> set or copy operations, therefore nothing that I can relate to
> kamailio's c code. Maybe it happens another time and the backtrace will
> be different.

I agree, Juha