[SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK [solved]

[David Villasmil]

Well,

As suggested, i decided to go with a single ip address.
Thanks everyone!

Thanks to @Federico Cabiddu <federico.cabiddu at gmail.com> i understood why
the ACK has no $du. This is because all record-routes have been consumed
because this is the final hop.

So no record-route, no $du. I have to use the ruri.

Regards,

David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
phone: +34669448337


On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:01 PM Antony Stone <
Antony.Stone at kamailio.open.source.it> wrote:

> On Monday 01 April 2019 at 21:51:13, David Villasmil wrote:
>
> > They're not, they're in the same subnet. At least on my tests.
>
> In that case I can only wonder why AWS works like this.
>
> I think I've run out of networking-based suggestions to fulfilling your
> requirements.
>
>
> Antony.
>
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 8:47 PM Antony Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > No, because (again, unless AWS works in some totally strange way that I
> > > can't imagine being the case) those two private IPs would be in
> different
> > > subnets, so only one is locally addressable by the other privately
> > > addressed machines.
>
> --
> "Can you keep a secret?"
> "Well, I shouldn't really tell you this, but... no."
>
>
>                                                    Please reply to the
> list;
>                                                          please *don't* CC
> me.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20190401/643c062b/attachment.html>