[SR-Users] RTPengine: shouldn't SDP <sess-version> be incremented when SDP is updated in-dialog?

[George Diamantopoulos]

Has anyone run into or is concerned by this? Thanks!

On 11 April 2018 at 16:28, George Diamantopoulos <georgediam at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I have the following issue (I think) with RTP engine. An INVITE comes in,
> and rtpengine will rewrite the SDP accordingly, as configured in
> kamailio.cfg. After some time a reINVITE is sent out in the opposite
> direction, for session refresh purposes. As I use rtcp-mux-offer in
> kamailio.cfg for this direction, RTPengine will inject the rtcp-mux
> parameter, and this reINVITE is forwarded to the UAC that sent the original
> INVITE.
>
> However, the SDP in the reINVITE is exactly the same as the SDP in the 200
> OK to the original INVITE, with the exception of the rtcp-mux parameter.
> Since the SDP offered from the same end has changed, shouldn't session
> version be incremented as well?
>
> Does this sound like something that should be reported as a bug to
> rtpengine? Or am I missing something here?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> George Diamantopoulos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20180504/9ef5d8d9/attachment.html>