[SR-Users] TOPOS module errors
Aleksandar Sosic
alex.sosic at evosip.cloud
Fri Jun 1 20:44:22 CEST 2018
Hi Daniel,
We've tried today to build from sources and test the patch you've
linked but unfortunately the errors
```
0(94) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:480]: tps_db_insert_dialog(): No
database handle - misconfiguration?
0(94) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:412]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store
```
are still present in the logs.
Kind regards,
--
Aleksandar Sosic
linkedin.com/in/alexsosic/
mail: alex.sosic at evosip.cloud
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:10 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I just pushed a patch to skip handling dmq requests, as done for local options (keepalive) and notify -- KDMQ is something internal to kamailio and was not considered when filtering out.
>
> - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/7ff8d4284f20763e8e47f9b24e4604867a242e4a
>
> Maybe you can give it a test just to be safe. I will backport it.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 30.05.18 11:39, Enrico Bandiera wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel, since it was just before the KWC I waited some time before pinging you :)
> Any news on this issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Enrico.
>
> 2018-05-03 15:42 GMT+02:00 Enrico Bandiera <enrico.bandiera at cloud.timenet.it>:
>>
>> Hi Daniel, tell me if you need more portions of the log:
>>
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:559]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 10==11 && [172.22.3.7] == [31.193.99.4]
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:566]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:559]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 10==10 && [172.22.3.7] == [172.22.3.7]
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:566]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060
>> 0(111) DEBUG: tm [uac.c:426]: t_uac_prepare(): next_hop=<sip:notification_peer at 127.0.0.1:5060>
>> 0(111) DEBUG: tm [uac.c:152]: dlg2hash(): hashid 25495
>> 0(111) DEBUG: topos [topos_mod.c:468]: tps_execute_event_route(): executing event_route[topos:...] (3)
>> 0(111) ERROR: <script>: HIDING TOPOLOGY: 1:5060:127.0.0.1
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:604]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:606]: parse_msg(): method: <KDMQ>
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:notification_peer at 127.0.0.1:5060>
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7936.bcc62347000000000000000000000000.0>; state=16
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:492]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:494]: parse_headers(): this is the first via
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): <To> [40]; uri=[sip:notification_peer at 127.0.0.1:5060]
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:172]: get_hdr_field(): to body [<sip:notification_peer at 127.0.0.1:5060>
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq <CSeq>: <10> <KDMQ>
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:183]: get_hdr_field(): content_length=69
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param(): add param: tag=2a154ea4a528648fbfaaac82505be461-4e03
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29
>> 0(111) DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:934]: tps_request_sent(): handling outgoing request (0, 1)
>> 0(111) DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:376]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - x_via1: [SIP/2.0/UDP 172.22.3.7;branch=z9hG4bK7936.bcc62347000000000000000000000000.0](76) - x_via2: [](0) - x_vbranch1: [z9hG4bK7936.bcc62347000000000000000000000000.0](46)
>> 0(111) DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:485]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr: [](0) - b_rr: [](0) - s_rr: [](0)
>> 0(111) DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:490]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - as_contact: [](0) - bs_contact: [](0)
>> 0(111) DEBUG: topos [tps_storage.c:124]: tps_storage_lock_get(): tps lock get: 120
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [sruid.c:182]: sruid_next(): new sruid is [tpsh-5aeb10fb-6f-1] (1 / 18)
>> 0(111) WARNING: topos [tps_storage.c:400]: tps_storage_record(): no local address - do record routing for all initial requests
>> 0(111) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:480]: tps_db_insert_dialog(): No database handle - misconfiguration?
>> 0(111) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:412]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store
>> 0(111) DEBUG: topos [tps_storage.c:136]: tps_storage_lock_release(): tps lock release: 120
>> 0(111) DEBUG: tm [uac.c:645]: send_prepared_request_impl(): uac: 0x7f88fdc0b468 branch: 0 to 127.0.0.1:5060
>> 0(111) DEBUG: tm [../../core/onsend.h:69]: run_onsend(): required parameters are not available - ignoring
>> 0(111) DEBUG: dmq [dmq_funcs.c:165]: bcast_dmq_message(): skipping node sip:172.22.3.7:5060
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:941]: init_mod_child(): idx 0 rank 0: htable [main]
>> 0(111) DEBUG: htable [htable.c:232]: child_init(): rank is (0)
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:941]: init_mod_child(): idx 0 rank 0: app_python [main]
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:941]: init_mod_child(): idx 0 rank 0: topos [main]
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [sruid.c:105]: sruid_init(): root for sruid is [tpsh-5aeb10fb-6f-] (0 / 17)
>> 0(111) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:1751]: main_loop(): Expect maximum 2266 open fds
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Enrico.
>>
>>
>> 2018-05-03 15:33 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Can you run with higher debug level (e.g., add -ddd), then reproduce and send here all DEBUG and the rest of log messages printed by the same PID showing this error?
>>>
>>> The main attendant doesn't handle sip traffic in fork=yes, but -DD is telling not to daemonize the main attendant, so I need to see what that process does before throwing the error messages.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03.05.18 13:45, Enrico Bandiera wrote:
>>>
>>> kamailio -f $PATH_KAMAILIO_CFG -DD -E -e
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Enrico.
>>>
>>> 2018-05-03 12:52 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> how do you start kamailio, or better, said what are the command line parameters?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03.05.18 12:26, Enrico Bandiera wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel, is kamcmd ps ok for this?
>>>>
>>>> 0(116) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:480]: tps_db_insert_dialog(): No database handle - misconfiguration?
>>>> 0(116) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:412]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store
>>>>
>>>> root at proxy-bbd996f48-mjzr4:/# kamcmd ps
>>>> 116 main process - attendant
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Enrico.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2018-05-03 11:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> can you get the output for
>>>>>
>>>>> kamctl ps
>>>>>
>>>>> and see the description for process with pid 94?
>>>>>
>>>>> I assume you run it in docker, given low pid value shown in the log message...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03.05.18 10:42, Enrico Bandiera wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi, I'm trying to use the TOPOS module to solve some MTU issues we have (we have multiple kamailio servers in our architecture and route/via headers are becoming a problem)
>>>>>
>>>>> The module seems to work but I'm getting these errors on the log:
>>>>>
>>>>> 0(94) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:480]: tps_db_insert_dialog(): No database handle - misconfiguration?
>>>>> 0(94) ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:412]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store
>>>>>
>>>>> I get these errors for some time after running kamailio and then they stop appearing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Data is inserted on topos_d and topos_t on the db, so I'm not sure what the error is referring to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any idea?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Enrico.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
More information about the sr-users
mailing list