[SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

[Yuriy Gorlichenko]

Yep this clear for me from the start.

For me for now not clear question  abot direct connect for now.

2018-07-02 10:00 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>:

> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:59:12AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
>
> > That was my point also...
> > But they sent me lint to rfc3261 12.1.2 and that confused me
> >
> > So just for resume:
> >
> > So am I right if I say that in case If provider receives INVITE with
> > Record-Route from my side (myProxy)
> > Provider should care about it's own Record-Route and it should have uri
> > where myProxy should sent ACK to instead of using Contact in thi case
> >
> > In case direct conntect UAC -> Provider I still need to use Contact field
> > as URI to send ACK to that explained on the 12.1.2 of rfc3261?
>
> If the provider sent you a Record-Route of their own in addition to any
> that you have placed there, your UAC must still follow it when
> contacting them for in-dialog requests.
>
> --
> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
>
> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20180702/12356066/attachment.html>