[SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

[Alex Balashov]

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:59:12AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:

> That was my point also...
> But they sent me lint to rfc3261 12.1.2 and that confused me
> 
> So just for resume:
> 
> So am I right if I say that in case If provider receives INVITE with
> Record-Route from my side (myProxy)
> Provider should care about it's own Record-Route and it should have uri
> where myProxy should sent ACK to instead of using Contact in thi case
> 
> In case direct conntect UAC -> Provider I still need to use Contact field
> as URI to send ACK to that explained on the 12.1.2 of rfc3261?

If the provider sent you a Record-Route of their own in addition to any
that you have placed there, your UAC must still follow it when
contacting them for in-dialog requests.

-- 
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) 
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/