[SR-Users] Return codes within a route

M S shaheryarkh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 23:10:01 CET 2018


My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return
value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always
explicitly return 1 or exit.

On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify.  I
> have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf.
> Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route.  In some
> cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching
> headers.
> Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#return
> seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route
> should return 1.  However, this route appears to be returning -1.
> My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and
> there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1
> (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core
> cookbook indicates?
> Thanks in advance,
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20180220/87a31d74/attachment.html>

More information about the sr-users mailing list