[SR-Users] Fwd: questions about FL_RPL flag in dmq_usrloc

张顺通 shuntongzhang at gmail.com
Thu May 25 10:56:00 CEST 2017


Is there any progress? Thanks

2017-05-04 16:49 GMT+08:00 Charles Chance <charles.chance at sipcentric.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I think in the case of a (re)register, the receiving server should become
> authoritive for that contact and remove any FL_RPL which may be present.
>
> I will take a look at this today/tomorrow along with the other issue
> reported on Github.
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>
> On 4 May 2017 09:35, "张顺通" <shuntongzhang at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> In dmq_usrloc, a ucontact_t with FL_RPL flag will not send it's modify to
>> other kamailio.
>>
>> For example, I have one edge and three kamailio(for register, name A B
>> C). And First SIP REGISTER send to edge, and edge forward to register
>> kamailio A, then kamailio B & C have FL_RPL flag, kamailio A do not
>> have FL_RPL flag.
>> In this situation,  If kamailio A is crash, the second SIP REGISTER(same
>> call-id and tag) forward to kamailio B, kamailio B will not replicate reg
>> info to C, because kamailio B have FL_RPL flag.
>>
>> What is the suggestion in this case?
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
> Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered
> office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street,
> Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170525/4629131e/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list