[SR-Users] Fwd: questions about FL_RPL flag in dmq_usrloc

[Charles Chance]

Hello,

I think in the case of a (re)register, the receiving server should become
authoritive for that contact and remove any FL_RPL which may be present.

I will take a look at this today/tomorrow along with the other issue
reported on Github.

Cheers,
Charles

On 4 May 2017 09:35, "张顺通" <shuntongzhang at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> In dmq_usrloc, a ucontact_t with FL_RPL flag will not send it's modify to
> other kamailio.
>
> For example, I have one edge and three kamailio(for register, name A B C).
> And First SIP REGISTER send to edge, and edge forward to register kamailio
> A, then kamailio B & C have FL_RPL flag, kamailio A do not have FL_RPL flag.
> In this situation,  If kamailio A is crash, the second SIP REGISTER(same
> call-id and tag) forward to kamailio B, kamailio B will not replicate reg
> info to C, because kamailio B have FL_RPL flag.
>
> What is the suggestion in this case?
> Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>

-- 
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered 
office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, 
Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170504/06da0a02/attachment-0001.html>