[SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

Huber Andreas andreas.huber at nagra.com
Fri May 12 14:47:23 CEST 2017


Hi,
We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon.
Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate !

Thanks,
Andreas

From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu
Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

Hi,
which version are you using?
A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0.

Regards,

Federico

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber at nagra.com<mailto:andreas.huber at nagra.com>> wrote:
Hello,

We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a  failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE.
We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect.

The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch.
But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something?

Kind Regards,
Andreas



_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users at lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170512/675820ad/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list