[SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route
Federico Cabiddu
federico.cabiddu at gmail.com
Fri May 12 11:56:02 CEST 2017
Hi,
which version are you using?
A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in
5.0.
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber at nagra.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to
> give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER
> and join the INVITE.
>
> We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using
> t_drop_replies() but it has no effect.
>
>
>
> The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is
> added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch.
>
> But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()?
> Or am I missing something?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170512/7306a5bc/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list