[SR-Users] Kamailio IMS NAT issue: PRACK/ACK RURI changing in P-CSCF

[Mojtaba]

Hi,
You mean that we should use either SBC or Proxy-CSCF (don't both of
them) as entry point of IMS network? Is it right?
Thank.
Mojtaba Esfandiari.S


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Carsten Bock <carsten at ng-voice.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a common scenario, where Kamailio needs to be in front of e.g SEMS:
> PCRF Integration for QoS. You need to access the IP of the sender and the
> SDP.
> You would have to integrate that into SEMS, but if you do, you can actually
> drop Kamailio as a Proxy-CSCf completely...
>
> Thanks,
> Carsten
>
> Am 21.06.2017 09:48 schrieb "Mojtaba" <mespio at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Is it not better to use SEMS as SBC in the front of your network? And
>> all P/S/I/CSCF have the private IP address.
>> Thanks
>> --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>



-- 
--Mojtaba Esfandiari.S