[SR-Users] t_relay dying ?

Tomi Hakkarainen tpaivaa at gmail.com
Sun Dec 24 10:55:40 CET 2017


Hi 
You said that only thing changed is the Provider chanded their end.
Have you compared the previous signaling to the current ?
Previous I mean before provider change their switch.
Could there be some difference and that causes this error.

Tomi

On 21 Dec 2017, at 23.01, Jean Cérien <cerien.jean at gmail.com> wrote:


Hello
I am using kamailio 5.0.2, on a debian 9 system.

Everything was running fine, until one of our voip provider changed his switch. Our kamailio is relaying between several voip providers and several asterisk (only the signalisation, no rtp).

When we get an invite from this new switch, we select an asterisk and relay it correctly to this box. However, the OK is relayed back. But when the voip providers sends an ACK for this OK, the t_relay function does not return at all, it just dies with no action and no error.

Here is the snippet from route(relay)

        xlog("L_INFO","route(relay)  @@ $rm - Source: $si:$sp, fu:$fu, tu:$tu\n" );
        $var(restrelay)=t_relay();
        xlog("L_INFO","route(relay)  @@ $rm - t_relay result: $var(restrelay)" );
        if (!$var(restrelay)) {

When processing the initial invite, I do get both INFO messages. When the ACK is processed, I only get one INFO message, and no ACK is relayed - so it seems execution dies in the t_relay

What could be wrong ???

J.

Details of the ACK:

ACK sip:dialednumber at kamailioIP:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP VOIPPROVIDERIP:5060;branch=z9hG4bKjq16fi00d85uee181ic0.1
To: <sip:kamailioIP:5060>;tag=as7f10ed48
From: <sip:sourcenumber at orange-multimedia.fr>;tag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000-0000
Call-ID: SD8u3ob01-688d41f5e2164ceeafe76f40b82b3f97-v300g00030
CSeq: 1 ACK
Max-Forwards: 66
Content-Length: 0
Route: <sip:kamailioIP;lr=on;ftag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000-0000;did=a0b.49d>



(should you have enough width; the diagram will look ok)

                   VOIP PROVIDER               KAMAILIO                       ASTERISK
  21:38:54.685149   │ ──────────────────────────> │                             │   
▒       +0.000451   │  100 trying -- your call is │                             │   
▒ 21:38:54.685600   │ <────────────────────────── │                             │   
▒       +0.000084   │                             │        INVITE (SDP)         │  
▒ 21:38:54.685684   │                             │ ──────────────────────────> │  
▒       +0.000831   │                             │         100 Trying          │  
▒ 21:38:54.686515   │                             │ <────────────────────────── │  
▒       +0.000471   │                             │        200 OK (SDP)         │  
▒ 21:38:54.686986   │                             │ <────────────────────────── │  
▒       +0.000394   │        200 OK (SDP)         │                             │   
▒ 21:38:54.687380   │ <────────────────────────── │                             │   
▒       +0.038694   │             ACK             │                             │   
▒ 21:38:54.726074   │ ──────────────────────────> │                             │   
▒       +0.060155   │                             │        200 OK (SDP)         │  
▒ 21:38:54.786229   │                             │ <<<──────────────────────── │  
▒       +0.000138   │        200 OK (SDP)         │                             │   
▒ 21:38:54.786367   │ <<<──────────────────────── │                             │   
▒       +0.005721   │             ACK             │                             │ 


_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20171224/45a2ad96/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list