[SR-Users] LCR Module Question

[Alberto Sagredo]

Thanks Both Fred/Juha

System is in production when i have a "free slot" i will check repeating
each rule with lower priority. I think that would work as i expect

Thanks for your tips guys!

Have a nice week

Alberto

2016-05-06 13:44 GMT+02:00 Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com>:

> Alberto Sagredo writes:
> >
> > I do not know if its enough to add under same lcr_id or its better to add
> > with different one and add several lcr_rule and lcr_rule_target
> >
> > Acordding to next_gw() function, what is better to be used? In my case. a
> > primary providers is used and only a backup one for the momment.
>
> If your rules would be the same for both, then you can add a backup gw
> to each rule with lower priority.  You can also use defunct_gw()
> function to make failing gws inactive for a period.
>
> If the rules are not the same, then in failure route you would need to
> call load_gws() with another lcr id.
>
> -- Juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160509/6b6a5cd3/attachment.html>